Search for: "People v Clark" Results 41 - 60 of 1,239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
A preliminary trial on meaning due to be heard last week has had to be relisted after actor Noel Clarke disinstructed his legal advisors shortly before the hearing. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
IPSO 12126-22 Nash, Waugh and The Lighthouse Group v The Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2023), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09772-23 Peet v Sunday People, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 14431-23 Resolution Statement Booley v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16942-23 Hood v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1… [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
This model prosecution memorandum (or “pros memo”) assesses federal charges Special Counsel Jack Smith may bring against former President Donald Trump for alleged criminal interference in the 2020 election. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
Some people are waving flags and watching the fireworks, proud of the America they think it is. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
China The Fei Chan Dao blog has published a translation of a Notice expelling Zhang Guilin, Former Director of the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the Beijing People’s Government, from the Party and Public Office for “serious violations of discipline and law. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
The government points to a long history of restricting gun ownership by people who pose a threat to others. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 19 and 20 June 2023 Steyn J heard the harassment case of Clarke v Rose. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Facebook did not respond directly to Haugen’s claims and instead provided CBS “with a list of tools and privacy features they’ve implemented to protect young people. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]