Search for: "People v Clark" Results 121 - 140 of 1,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Clark’s conduct in late 2020 and early 2021 was also the focus of a hearing by the House committee probing the January 6 attack on the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:20 pm by Benjamin Pollard
The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm by Frank Cranmer
 As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
  From 1795 through 1934, Congress regularly sanctioned people who defied its authority, and many Supreme Court decisions recognized its “inherent” power to do so. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
Clark was about sleeping in the park—again, didn't matter why people were sleeping there, even though the government may have been targeting the homeless protesters. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:27 am by James Jolin
Pointing to the Controlled Substances Act, Haskell-Hoehl also noted that, even when divorced from religious activity, federal regulation of drugs may be calamitous — especially on Black people and other people of color. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:40 pm by Bill Marler
People just don’t really understand how horrible food-borne illness is,” said William Marler, a prominent Seattle-based food-safety lawyer who is representing the Rivera family and 23 other victims in the cookie dough outbreak. [read post]