Search for: "People v Collins" Results 21 - 40 of 709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2017, 11:53 am
While Collins bled to death, defendant dropped his jacket and his knife near her body. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 6:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Thanks to Rick Collins, Sarah Krakoff, Carla Fredericks, Kristen Carpenter, and the rest of the great people at CU. [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:03 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Tomorrow, the California Supreme Court will release its decision in People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Teaching academic, author of acclaimed defamation law textbooks, leading media law barrister in Australia and the UK, Dr Matt Collins QC packs a lot into his day … He agreed to spare some of his time to discuss defamation, privacy, celebrity, journalists’ sources, and free speech, just for starters GLJ: I wanted to start by asking you what you see as the major flaws in Australian defamation law, and how you might go about correcting them. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
… Part IV: The Canadian Context – Religious Persecution of Indigenous peoples In its eloquent introduction to the ground-breaking Métis rights decision in Daniels v Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada observed: “As the curtain opens wider and wider on the history of Canada’s relationship with its Indigenous peoples, inequities are increasingly revealed and remedies urgently sought. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:27 pm
  Not three.Ten different Ninth Circuit judges recuse themselves from the en banc call:  Judges McKeown, Wardlaw, Bybee, Bea, Watford, Owens, Friedland, Miller, Collins, and Lee.So it's an opinion that may affect at least a nontrivial number of people in a particular socioeconomic group. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:49 am by Howard Wasserman
They further show that this increase began not with the Robert Bork hearings in 1987, but actually a year earlier with William Rehnquist's nomination to be Chief.* Although Ringhand and Collins don't say it in so many terms, the conclusion people are drawing is that hearings are substantive, meaningful, and beneficial, not the "vapid and hollow charade" that Professor Kagan decried in her sure-to-be-talked-about 1995 article. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:58 pm
  After all, the purpose of the fence, just like the windshield here, was in part to keep unwanted people and things out. [read post]