Search for: "People v Cotto"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2020, 9:56 am
Mangual v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:26 pm
From Judge Pedro Delgado-Hernández's opinion today in Rodriguez-Cotto v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:25 am
People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:01 pm
“[Mayweather v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
In Rumsfeld v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
"[9] Thus, for instance, that some people are offended or alienated by an employee's religion does not justify the employer in firing the employee. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 7:07 pm
The Connecticut Supreme Court said in 1999 (not 2015 as The New York Times indicated) in Cotto v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:01 am
" But the Connecticut Supreme Court in Cotto v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
