Search for: "People v Ellis" Results 41 - 60 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2013, 8:33 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
Horvitz Professor of Law, Harvard Law SchoolOct. 9 Risa Goluboff, John Allan Love Professor of Law and Professor of History, University of Virginia, “People out of Place: The Sixties, the Supreme Court, and Vagrancy Law”Comment: Lisa McGirr, Professor of History, Department of History, Harvard UniversityOct 16: Serena Mayeri, Professor of Law and History, University of Pennsylvania, “Status of Marriage: Marital Supremacy Challenged and Remade, 1960-2000”Comment:… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:59 am by David Smith
The references to "couple" (and to "partner") do not impose such a requirement: they identify one of two people in a relevant relationship. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:59 am by David Smith
The references to "couple" (and to "partner") do not impose such a requirement: they identify one of two people in a relevant relationship. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:41 am
. - Five years after the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am by Warren Gordon, Olswang LLP
While the Apportionment Act 1870 allows for rent payable in arrear to be apportionable (based on a day to day accrual), the famous case of Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740 held that the Act does not apply to rent payable in advance. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 held that the damage did not need to be exactly the same – the rule should be flexible in order to do justice. [read post]