Search for: "People v Ellis" Results 41 - 60 of 364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
  Prof That same panel is hearing two other IP cases: Samsung v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
Security Council meeting that the U.S. wished to tighten sanctions against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, which she said has test-fired 17 ballistic missiles this year. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Benjamin Wittes analyzed Judge David Carter’s March 28 opinion on Donald Trump and John Eastman in Eastman v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
House Jan. 6 Committee Subpoenas Giuliani, Sidney Powell MSN – Jacqueline Alemany and Tom Hamburger (Washington Post) | Published: 1/18/2022 The House committee investigating the insurrection of January 6, 2021, issued subpoenas to members of former President Trump’s outside legal team who pursued and disseminated unfounded claims of mass election fraud, including Trump’s former personal attorney Rudolph Giuliani, former White House aide Boris Epshteyn, and lawyers Jenna… [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Thoms, Director, Archaeological-Ecology Laboratory, Texas A&M UniversityKara Ellis, Archivist, the William J. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Thoms, Director, Archaeological-Ecology Laboratory, Texas A&M UniversityKara Ellis, Archivist, the William J. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court decision in 2013, and another this year, weakened the landmark law, while Republican-controlled Legislatures passed new voting restrictions advocates say target people of color, as well as young and working-class people. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm by Alvaro Marañon, Benjamin Wittes
As Ellis describes, “[the hackers] have very little to lose by doing this—and potentially a big payday to gain. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am by CMS
Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 held that the damage did not need to be exactly the same – the rule should be flexible in order to do justice. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by INFORRM
AWQC’s submissions on this point included the following: Unlike Warby J, the Court of Appeal disregarded binding case law which restricts the availability of representative actions for damages (notably Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 and Markt & Co. [read post]