Search for: "People v English"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2010, 8:45 pm
Therefore, when we see Citizens United cited in the future, we won't hear people say, "Justice Kennedy said . . . [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm
The petitioner in Gamble v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm
” In short, as summed up by the court in People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Arizona v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 8:18 am
Beijing IP Court and Beijing Municipal High People's Court) did not agree. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 11:20 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:32 pm
Not surprisingly, my Plain English inbox was filled this week with questions about Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
The Amendment was added by the Irish people in order to prevent the judicial creation of a right to abortion, as in Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:14 am
And what they might well have meant is to punish extra hard people who molest people younger than ten. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 7:36 am
Therefore, he gives out the big words without hesitation to people who lack English proficiency. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:54 am
The Supreme Court has ruled that the pre-nuptial agreeement signed in the case of Radmacher -V- Garantino is enforceable and that it agreed that in the right case such agreements can have decisive or compelling weight. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm
From the landmark case of Campbell and the development of breach of privacy as an action, it is clear that the integration of privacy as a concept in English law is still in its formative years. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The joint judgment in two separate claims against Google, is the first time the English courts have had to rule on the application of the ‘right to be forgotten’ principle following the decision in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12). [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 6:35 am
Oklahoma: Understanding the Implications of the Recent Supreme Court Decision Across Native America In celebration of Indigenous Peoples’ Day, Emory University Professor of English Craig Womack (Creek) chairs a panel discussion titled McGirt V. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm
Connick v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Bennett and McComish v. [read post]
