Search for: "People v English" Results 141 - 160 of 2,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
The reporting (in English) of the ceremony and the English translation of the 100 commitments follows with thanks to the Pressenza International News Agency which posted originally.The most interesting part of the speech--and its most revealing, is the reference to Benito Juarez's dictum:  “con el pueblo todo, sin el pueblo nada” ["with the people everything, without the people nothing"]. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
Next week’s oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am by Amy Howe
  (My earlier Plain English coverage of the case is available here.) [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The effect of section 9 is that where a claimant brings a defamation claim relating to a statement published online and read in England (by a relatively small number of people) and read in, say, the USA (by a much larger number of people), the English court will usually not have jurisdiction to hear any of the claim (including insofar as it relates to the publication in England). [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:35 am by Simon Fodden
Last week, at Kingston Crown Court, a seven-week trial had to be aborted because the jurors started on the Internet and Googling people, and the judge found out because the other jurors reported the errant juror. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:03 am
Stanford student Daniel Matro discusses the opinion in Flores-Figueroa v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:09 pm
On 4 December 2019, the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC) held a press conference at Wuzhen, Zhejiang, in conjunction with the publication of a significant white paper titled Chinese Courts and the Internet Judiciary (downloadable here, in Chinese and in English). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm by Lisa McElroy
Marshall was the author of one of the Court’s best-known opinions, tMarbury v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm by John Gregory
A recent English court case, Football Dataco Ltd et al. v Sportradar GmbH [2010] EWHC 2911 (Ch), has held that at least for some purposes, the jurisdiction of a court over Internet content should be based on where the server was located, and not where the information online was read or used. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 am by INFORRM
What many people may not be aware of is that if an individual has registered with the Telephone Preference Service, these calls are unlawful and the company responsible may be fined. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On this day in history, Lord Mansfield of the King’s Bench in England issued a ruling in the case of Somerset v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On this day in history, Lord Mansfield of the King’s Bench in England issued a ruling in the case of Somerset v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm by Jon
Constitution should be taken from lay English of 1787, or from legal English. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who has not… [read post]