Search for: "People v English"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
In Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines v Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Limited [2010] EWHC 2661 (Comm), the English Commercial Court was asked to consider the effect on a contract of insurance of an order made by the UK Government for the purposes of preventing nuclear proliferation.The Background The claimant, Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), was a member of the defendant Protection & Indemnity Insurance Club, Steamship Mutual… [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
What many people may not be aware of is that if an individual has registered with the Telephone Preference Service, these calls are unlawful and the company responsible may be fined. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
The effect of section 9 is that where a claimant brings a defamation claim relating to a statement published online and read in England (by a relatively small number of people) and read in, say, the USA (by a much larger number of people), the English court will usually not have jurisdiction to hear any of the claim (including insofar as it relates to the publication in England). [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:09 pm
On 4 December 2019, the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC) held a press conference at Wuzhen, Zhejiang, in conjunction with the publication of a significant white paper titled Chinese Courts and the Internet Judiciary (downloadable here, in Chinese and in English). [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:21 am
Given that 658 people did not reach a settlement but were apparently left untroubled, Virgin Media argued that this was evidence that the Applicants in the present case were simply interested in setting up a money-making scheme, not suing anyone or seeking genuine redress. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm
Let’s talk about Friedrichs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:12 am
The case, Arizona v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
On Thursday, in Sykes v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm
Constitution should be taken from lay English of 1787, or from legal English. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm
and I’ll explain it in Plain English. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:48 pm
The English version follows.Reviews Jade WhiteThe following commentaries are responses to A Looming Crisis for China’s Legal System, by Jerome A. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am
On this day in history, Lord Mansfield of the King’s Bench in England issued a ruling in the case of Somerset v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Armour v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 7:16 am
M.H. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
The online English-language article was, however, read by at least 200 people in Canada. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who has not… [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
While Aerotel placed a large wedge between the EPO Board of Appeals and English courts, recent cases have been bridging the gap, particularly in the area of obviousness in non-software cases (namely, Conor v Angiotech and Actavis v Merck). [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 8:08 am
Faust v. [read post]
