Search for: "People v Flowers"
Results 1 - 20
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2024, 8:51 am
This case involves augmented reality (AR) effects/”filters” that people can use to doctor up images and videos on social media, such as the ability to add virtual bunny ears, flower crowns, or cat whiskers to people in the image or video. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm
Blehm v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
From Hayes v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
That concept is distinguished from the more traditional concept that embeds people in time, but that human institutions and collective ordering realities exist out of or outside of time. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
In June 2023, in 303 Creative v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
In Lyng v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
The key case on this is NAACP v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 11:11 am
To many people in Ms. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:17 am
Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 11:53 am
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
SEC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
The government points to a long history of restricting gun ownership by people who pose a threat to others. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
La Barbera v. [read post]
