Search for: "People v Flowers" Results 41 - 60 of 344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
 And then there is the case of State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2006, 1:13 pm
• 4 flowers in each box (flowers weren't always in the same pattern)• 100 total flowers in red boxes• 84 little white boxes on ceiling• 40 long white flowers in 20 blue boxes on ceiling• Blue squares w/ flowers in each of 4 corners• 6 lights in blue boxes on ceiling• 30 little blue boxes with white flowers (not… [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:24 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
Flowers, the Court clarified that people are eligible for relief under the First Step Act even if their Guidelines remain unchanged. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm by ACLU
Black people are resilient — we’ve created so much already. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Robert then tackled Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, in which the CJEU viewed the impression of the average internet user as being an essential element of the test of whether the use of another's brand as a keyword conveys an impression that the use of that brand suggests that the user's business is connected with that of the brand owner. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law.com, David Ogden weighs in on Flowers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:03 am
It's dark and not many people are out and about yet. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am by Tian Lu
The obvious difference lies in the text: whilst Chanel has ‘N°5, CHANEL’, the alleged infringing product uses ‘N°9, FLOWER OF STORY’ (hereinafter ‘the N°9 perfume’). [read post]