Search for: "People v Garland" Results 1 - 20 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2021, 8:38 am by Cecillia Wang
  Additionally, we urge Garland to commit to ending the tragic use of police force on people with psychiatric disabilities. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 7:34 pm
On October 15, 2009, the Michigan Court of Appeals released for publication its unanimous decision in People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
   That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:58 am by Josh Douglas
Times Editorial, point out the unprecedented nature of the Senate Republicans' refusal to consider the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:09 pm
  And Judge VanDyke expresses this belief in his opinion three separate times; it's not inadvertent.My own experience is that (1) people commonly use the term "evangelical Christian" to mean something very specific and different from just your run-of-the-mill Christian, and (2) most -- or at least, many -- people of the Christian faith do not, in fact, actively seek to proselytize and convert people to the faith.Now, I grew up in Virginia, whereas Judge… [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 12:23 pm
  As a result, there are plenty of people like Mr. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:46 pm
(Of a sort, anyway.)So, to take you back to those halcyon days of law school, I thought I'd turn it into one and let whomever wishes take the exam.Here goes:"A federal statute provides that people can be deported ("removed") from the United States if they have committed a crime of 'child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment.' Defendant is found guilty in state court of the crime of 'child endangerment' for driving while drunk while his five-year… [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:22 pm
You'd think that people could agree on doing something about it. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:24 am
(Judge VanDyke's concurring opinion is even more deferential.)Were the question limited to whether the government can stop Twitter from telling people that it didn't receive, say, any subpoenas in a particular category, I could see how that might be legitimately classified. [read post]