Search for: "People v Hatch"
Results 1 - 20
of 255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
So, Hatch's statement about imperial judges hardly describes the federal bench, and it certainly does not describe Sotomayor's judicial philosophy, which many people view as centrist.The second way of approaching this issue is more complex. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
In 1947 in the case United Public Workers of America v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:12 pm
People v Gomez, 65 NY2d 9, 10-12; People v Mooney, 62 AD3d 725; People v Robinson, 16 AD3d 768, 769-770, lv denied 4 NY3d 856). [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:46 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:15 pm
See Hatch v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 pm
In January 2011 the President closed the White House Office of Political Affairs (OPA) and moved his political people to Chicago. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:05 am
In Martin v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:31 pm
” (People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:26 am
Along this line, compare Justice Scalia's discussion of text in the Hatch-Waxman Act in Merck v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:26 am
jamison-v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm
In a sense, the indirect consequences of Mass v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:05 am
My morning distraction was reading the Hatch-Waxman 25th Anniversary Trivia by Kurt Karst. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:47 pm
Along this line, compare Justice Scalia's discussion of text in the Hatch-Waxman Act in Merck v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
Epton; People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:50 pm
article=1479&context=btljFurthermore, some people considered inter partes re-examination to be quite effective:Seehttp://sunsteinlaw.com/inter-partes-reexamination-digs-a-patent-graveyard/**Whether challenging pharma patents through non-Hatch-Waxman procedures evadesthe "balance" negotiated at the time of Hatch-Waxman can be contemplated. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:16 pm
In this sample from the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet and Anne break down the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, who faces murder charges for fatally shooting two people during protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:03 pm
Burke v. [read post]
Ind. Courts - More on: COA will hear oral arguments today in dispute over Terre Haute mayor's office
9 Jul 2008, 1:35 pm
Some quotes:The Indiana Court of Appeals listened to arguments Tuesday in the case of Burke v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:48 am
Our Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]