Search for: "People v Hatch" Results 1 - 20 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
So, Hatch's statement about imperial judges hardly describes the federal bench, and it certainly does not describe Sotomayor's judicial philosophy, which many people view as centrist.The second way of approaching this issue is more complex. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 6:12 pm by Brian Shiffrin
People v Gomez, 65 NY2d 9, 10-12; People v Mooney, 62 AD3d 725; People v Robinson, 16 AD3d 768, 769-770, lv denied 4 NY3d 856). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 pm by Richard Painter
In January 2011 the President closed the White House Office of Political Affairs (OPA) and moved his political people to Chicago. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Along this line, compare Justice Scalia's discussion of text in the Hatch-Waxman Act in Merck v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm by Dru Stevenson
In a sense, the indirect consequences of Mass v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:05 am by Neal Fortin
My morning distraction was reading the Hatch-Waxman 25th Anniversary Trivia by Kurt Karst. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:47 pm
Along this line, compare Justice Scalia's discussion of text in the Hatch-Waxman Act in Merck v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
article=1479&context=btljFurthermore, some people considered inter partes re-examination to be quite effective:Seehttp://sunsteinlaw.com/inter-partes-reexamination-digs-a-patent-graveyard/**Whether challenging pharma patents through non-Hatch-Waxman procedures evadesthe "balance" negotiated at the time of Hatch-Waxman can be contemplated. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:16 pm by CAFE
In this sample from the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet and Anne break down the case of Kyle Rittenhouse, who faces murder charges for fatally shooting two people during protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:35 pm
Some quotes:The Indiana Court of Appeals listened to arguments Tuesday in the case of Burke v. [read post]