Search for: "People v Hicks"
Results 61 - 80
of 134
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2015, 12:50 am
So maybe this is simply a convoluted way of getting people to eat the problem rather than face lengthy court proceedings. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
In 2007, Australian David Hicks, who was picked up in 2001 after training with al Qaeda, pleaded guilty to providing material support to terrorism; the CMCR voided his conviction and sentence on the grounds that, in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 12:31 pm
Citizens v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:34 pm
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:22 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:22 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:22 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:22 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals decision in Hicks v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Although summary dismissals do have precedential value (meaning that they have to be followed), they lose that force “when doctrinal developments indicate otherwise,” as the Court held in Hicks v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
Hicks, and Justice Kennedy's concurrence in the judgment and Justice Souter's dissent in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:17 am
In a lesson about using “flimsy grounds” for stopping people on suspicion of texting while driving, an Ontario Superior Court judge has thrown out an alcohol-related conviction after a cop stopped a driver he thought had a cellphone in his hand while at a red light.The officer “clearly operated on a hunch,” says Richard Litkowski, an associate at Hicks Adams LLP who represented Imran Mughal on the appeal of his conviction in R. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm
Hicks, or whether this Court acquiesces in the Ninth Circuit’s contrary decision in Water Wheel Camp Recreation Area v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:25 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:17 pm
Hicks Boulevard, a fact that already has been established in this litigation. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
., LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
An interesting case is Hicks v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:19 pm
Maxine Hicks, Mark E. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:39 am
” Ward v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:03 am
A katpat goes to Michael Hicks (who appeared for F&C) for giving him sight of the ruling [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
R (on the application of Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1947 (Admin). [read post]
