Search for: "People v Holder"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
In what amounts to an interest-free loan from the rest of us to large property holders, rich people under current law can see their fortunes rise, but so long as they do not sell their shares for cash, they never have to pay tax. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
On the other hand, in 1997, long before Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 8:29 am
The decision was issued by summary order, without precedential effect (Barron v. [read post]
We (Buchanan and Dorf) Aren't the Ones Saying the President Should "Invoke" the Fourteenth Amendment
6 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Rather, as I shall explain, it is the people on the other side of this argument who want to invoke the Fourteenth Amendment.In very condensed form, the Buchanan/Dorf position goes like this: Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the powers to spend, tax, and borrow. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:25 am
In August, the Supreme People's Court (SPC) of the People's Republic of China affirmed a jurisdictional decision in an OPPO v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:47 pm
She drew attention to the fact that, in the leading case of Delfi AS v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
(Pasqua Yaqui Tribe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:05 pm
Holder (2013) and Brnovich v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:51 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
Pix Credit: Council of Europe--Paris Principles at 25. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 9:05 pm
Holder and Brnovich v. [read post]
TM infringement and false advertising claims related to putative open source software "fork" succeed
16 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Neo4j, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
The Epic v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
In Holder v. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:19 am
Sharp decision by the Supreme People's Court (SPC) of the People's Republic of China (PRC) already demonstrated that the Chinese judiciary considers it stance on SEPs to be balanced and perfectly compatible with the concept of international comity (which in this context means that courts in one country respect their counterparts in another).Even clearer is the message that the Chinese government has for the EU. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
In Chichak v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 10:22 am
Goodrich v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
On page 3, the memo refers to the substantial percentage of people who returned to their home country rather than continue in MPP. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
Post 2 (of 2) on Clews v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:41 am
Holder. [read post]
