Search for: "People v Johnson" Results 201 - 220 of 2,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2006, 11:43 am
Johnson, No. 05-1444, remands based on a petition for rehearing, which was held in abeyance based on the SCOTUS's decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am by Suzanne A. Luban
§ 924(c), applying the reasoning of two prior High Court cases on this topic, Johnson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
And as if that wasn't enough, many of the people in gover [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:24 am
The court of appeals reasoned that, just as the city could not punish someone for their status – being homeless – it also could not punish them for conduct 'that is an unavoidable consequence of being homeless.'"Writes Amy Howe, at SCOTUSblog.Here's the 9th Circuit opinion: Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:09 pm by Levin Papantonio
The women claimed the company’s talc-based baby powder caused their ovarian cancer when they used it as a part of their daily feminine hygiene routine.In 2020, Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay more than $100 million to resolve more than 1,000 lawsuits blaming its baby powder for causing cancer.About Chris TisiChristopher V. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:29 am
Talc litigation is undoubtedly on the rise, as more and more people are becoming aware of the serious possible health implications of its use. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 7:01 pm by James Romoser
His legal team argued for years that Johnson was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins v. [read post]