Search for: "People v Johnson" Results 81 - 100 of 2,732
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 8:11 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Court of Appeals has repeatedly held that a prospective juror with actual bias, such as an opinion that the defendant is guilty, is qualified to serve on a jury as long as gives an unequivocal assurance she can be fair and impartial (People v Nicholas, 98 NY2d 749, 751 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600, 614 [2000]). [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:11 pm
Michigan Lawyers Weekly, The Oakland Press and the Detroit Legal News recently published my letter on Johnson v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:08 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [Bahamas] [Habitual residence] [Petition denied]     In Johnson v Johnson, 2023 WL 3981682 (D. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:44 am by Justin Walsh
  But Justice Jim Johnson put those laws and the people they protect at risk. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2010 NY Slip Op 51103 The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 2:58 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: “In many ways, it’s almost like gaslighting,” Wenona Singel says of the Johnson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Karen Tani
The Civil Rights Revolution transformed the Constitution, but not through judicial activism or Article V amendments. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
Our government’s good efforts for the safety of the people risks an erosion of support by the people. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:24 am by Justin Walsh
” Read more: http://www.theolympian.com/2010/06/08/v-print/1265042/trial-lawyer-wants-to-take-on.html#ixzz0qNhHRlYs?? [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
Judgment The claim arose of the publication of an election leaflet by Mr Johnson. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am by Charles Johnson
YOUR RIGHTS When people talk about “rights” in the federal criminal justice system, they are usually talking about the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]