Search for: "People v Legall" Results 1 - 20 of 32,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2017, 10:29 am by Bill Amadeo
Cress” which lays out the elements that have to be proven (People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:14 pm by legalinformatics
Subhajit Basu of the University of Leeds School of Law, and Joe Duffy of Queen’s University of Belfast, have published Providing affordable, accessible legal information and advice for older people: As much a question of accessibility as affordability, European Journal of Law and Technology, v. 1, no. 3 (2010). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:59 pm by Al Raymond
On July 3, 2012, a three-judge panel of the the First Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the summary judgment granted to People’s United Bank in the case of Patco Construction Co., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:35 am by Darryl Brown
There is a literature on comparative political economy that explores how various national economic policies (e.g., more market-oriented v. more social welfare and market-coordinating) do relative to each other in terms of economic growth and other measures of wellbeing.  Related literature explores the effect of different legal systems on national economic growth and other policy indicia.  Some work is more specific, looking at, say, regulation of public firms or… [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Bain Court Discusses Whether the Evidence was Legally Insufficient for Conviction The defendant indicted and convicted for manslaughter in the second degree, vehicular manslaughter in the second degree, and driving while intoxicated after an accident that resulted in his wife’s death. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 11:08 am
From America's Voice: A Better Option for The Economy: Mass Legalization or Mass Deportation? [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The People on the other hand, maintained that the search was legal. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The law does not require the same degree of proof to hold a defendant for action of the Grand Jury as is demanded for conviction; however, the proof must be sufficient on its face to sustain conviction of the defendant akin to People v Eckert and People v Donahue. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm by Jon
That just is not the way the people of that era thought. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 2:40 pm by Stephen Gillers
Is anyone to blame (people will be blamed but that does not mean that they are to blame). [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:52 am
Appellate Law & Practice of California reports this legal malpractice case:"CA1: Legal malpractice claims by 3d-party based on defrauded ponzi scheme fail International Strategies v. [read post]