Search for: "People v Muniz" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Katz, The Role of Public Reason in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
That was the question the 6th Circuit wrestled with in their decision last week in Muniz v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
This happened in the New York case of Muniz and the Ohio case of Wheeler. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:15 pm by Gideon
This one comes courtesy of the 6th Circuit (and via Volokh) in Muniz v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:29 am by Laura Orr
" (link to full Statesman-Journal article) 2) Read the September 30, 2009, State v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:56 am by admin
Smith, 647 F.3d 619 (6th Cir. 2011)), suffer from alcoholism during trial (People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 4:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court of Appeals in People v Muniz established that, as a general rule, this inquiry is limited to a comparison of the crimes' elements as they are respectively defined in the foreign and Ne [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:37 am by David Post
Thus, 6th Amendment protections do not apply to: proceedings involving "petty" (as opposed to "serious") crimes, as measured by the length of the authorized prison term, Muniz v. [read post]