Search for: "People v Murray" Results 81 - 100 of 577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The amicus brief of Serena Mayeri, Melissa Murray, and Reva Siegel in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
This decision, as well as the Court of Appeal’s decision in Riley v Murray [2022] EWCA Civ 1146, provides an opportune moment to review the recent case law on section 3 and to assess how the courts have interpreted the three conditions at the core of the honest opinion defence. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:44 am
In particular, I critique the decision N.A.A.C.P. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:36 pm
“Peering” designates a legal practice of gazing at poor people. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:43 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The case, Ter Beek v City of Wyoming, involves the legal challenge brought by a card-carrying pot smoker against his hometown for an ordinance that was passed in response to the MMA.The challenged Wyoming ordinance subjects people to a violation for possessing marijuana on the basis of the federal prohibition of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, as set forth in the federal Controlled Substance Act. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon Civic… [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 5:30 am
Most people know that law makes it a crime to possess certain things, like drugs or child pornography. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:19 am by Andrew Appel
Murray Snow got this only two-thirds right in a ruling in the U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by Rick Garnett
It is both misguided and quixotic, then, to employ the First Amendment to smooth out the bumps and divisions that are an unavoidable part of the political life of a diverse and free people. [read post]