Search for: "People v Murray"
Results 101 - 120
of 545
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Loving v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Sara Murray, Kristen Holmes, and Gabby Orr report for CNN. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Murray is “the most important woman lawyer few people know about. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
The state of Victoria is leading the push to extend the existing defamation defence of absolute privilege to people who make complaints to police and bodies such as anti-discrimination commissions and professional disciplinary bodies. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 12:21 pm
Long ago, the United States Supreme Court concluded that the “seas” referenced in one statute required no water at all (Murray’s Lessee v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 6:47 am
While the historic 1999 Supreme Court decision Olmstead v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 11 August 2022, the Court of Appeal (Arnold LJ, Dingemans LJ and Warby LJ) gave judgment in Riley v Murray [2022] EWCA Civ 1146. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:59 am
See Frazee v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
(The rule takes its name from Chief Justice Marshall's decision in Murray v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
The Norweigan hacker Runa Sandvik has launched Granitt, a service for at-risk people like activists, journalists and refugees. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am
Zachary Cohen, Sara Murray and Jason Morris report for CNN. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There being two legitimate aims, the next question was whether the restriction was proportionate to them; the means chosen to achieve those aim must (a) be rationally connected to the objective and not be arbitrary, unfair or based on irrational considerations, (b) impair the right as little as possible, and (c) be such that their effects on rights are proportional to the objective … (Murphy v IRTC [46] (Barrington J), following Heaney v Ireland [1994] 3 IR… [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
On 1 July 2022, summary judgment was given in favour of the defendants in Haviland v Lownie [2022] EWHC 1688 (QB) by Murray J. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:48 am
It is both misguided and quixotic, then, to employ the First Amendment to smooth out the bumps and divisions that are an unavoidable part of the political life of a diverse and free people. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 5:56 pm
“With this extremist Supreme Court poised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
IPKat has a post on the China’s image rights and the threshold for protection of the right to likeness following the publication of the nine “Typical civil cases of judicial protection of personality rights after the promulgation of the Civil Code of China” from the Supreme People’s Court of China. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm
Researchers have revealed the specific harms and disproportionate negative impacts surveillance and algorithmic tools can have on disabled people in education, the legal system, health care and the workplace. [read post]