Search for: "People v Murray" Results 121 - 140 of 545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 6:30 am by ernst
Very few people remember, however, the Court's first reproductive rights case, Skinner v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Eleonora Maria Mazzoli argues that, in a world where social media and search engines have become integral to how people find and access information and news online, an approach focused on a negative rights philosophy is insufficient. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection Google is being sued for allegedly using NHS health data belonging to 1.6 million people without their consent. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
On the same day there was a hearing in the case of Amazon v Tejan-Kella before Murray J. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Media Blog has an article on recent findings of an evidence review on young people’s digital literacy, online resilience and wellbeing, conducted as part of research for the ySKILLS project. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
  As we mention below, judgment was given in the PTR last week.is The Facebook Oversight Board has upheld the 7 January 2021 decision to ban former-President Donald Trump from the platform, after his social media activity was partially blamed for inciting the violence at the January 6 Capitol riots, in which five people died. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The amicus brief of Serena Mayeri, Melissa Murray, and Reva Siegel in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 01743-21 Power v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 08762-21 Nita v edinburghnews .scotsman.com, 14 Confidential sources (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 10375-21 Warde v Bridport & Lyme Regis News, 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 00505-22 Various v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as… [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The UK GDPR has previously been successful in suing people who may have undesirable/compromising information about an someone on their device. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Government has added two new duties to the proposed Online Safety Bill  that are aimed at protecting people against anonymous online abuse. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
Donziger is an extension of the civil RICO case of Chevron Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Erin Molan and Nyadol Nyuon have said it would be “almost impossible” to uptake and not “useful” to most people in Australia due to the cost and effort involved, the Guardian reports. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
These scams include embedded cyberattacks that “steal people’s personal data, peddle dodgy financial investments or break into bank accounts. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Clean Up the Internet has published its support of the UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport’s revised measures to protect people from anonymous trolls with the Online Safety Bill. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 24 February 2022, the Court of Appeal refused all fifteen grounds of appeal in Cheng v Pan; Cheng v Zhou [2022] NSWCA 21. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:36 am by Kay Marbiah
  [1] Bloomberg LP v ZXC, [2022] UKSC 5, available here: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2020-0122-judgment.pdf [2] Judgment, para 13 [3] Judgment, para 18 [4] Judgment, para 21 [5] Judgment, para 67 [6] Judgment, para 50 [7] Judgment, para 81 [8] Judgment, para 108 [9] Judgment, para 111 [10] Judgment, para 116 [11] Judgment, para 121 [12] Judgment, para 142 [13] Judgment, para 127 [14] Judgment, para 140 [15] Judgment, paras 154 and 155 [16]… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
"—Melissa Murray "As contemporary events continue to focus our attention on what the United States would be like without access to legal abortion, Matthiesen asks us to consider that by making pregnancy and childbirth into a 'choice,' Roe v. [read post]