Search for: "People v Napoli" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 7:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Here are two related to pictures on Facebook:from Dennis v Napoli, 2015 N.Y. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ctr., 120 AD3d 932 [4th Dept 2014); Parker & Waichman v Napoli, 29 AD3d 396, 399 [1st Dept 2006); Vinokur v Penny Lane Owners Corp., 269 AD2d 226 [1st Dept 2000)). [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
Michael Stevens at the Kentucky Law Review does a great round up of posts and materials on Medicaid subrogation in light of Alhorn v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by SHG
At a time when so many communities are struggling to give meaning to the 50-year-old promise of Gideon v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
 The problem, however, is that some people just don’t much like being “n [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:59 am by Eric Turkewitz
I was looking for someone who had fought uphill battles for people in need. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Very difficult claim to make because the information is public, or shared with a large number of people. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
But, again, you can’t make people watch, listen, or read if they don’t want to. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract:      Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract:      Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The rhetoric-reality gap is attributable in part to a dilemma the Court created for itself: its national policy favoring arbitration is constitutionally-suspect unless people assent, yet letting people make what contracts they wish would prevent implementing the national policy. [read post]