Search for: "People v Parker" Results 81 - 100 of 541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am by Dave
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 7:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The issue for the Court of Appeals (Winter, Parker and Hall) is what to do about this violation. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
People in Weatherford, Mineral Wells, Aledo, Azle, Springtown, Peaster, Cool, Millsap, Brock, Willow Park, Hudson Oaks, and other places in Parker County will make mistakes in insurance applications. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Most people in Weatherford, Mineral Wells, Aledo, Azle, Willow Park, Hudson Oaks, and other places in Parker County would have a hard time understanding what constitutes "bad faith" in insurance. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
Here is one that would be interesting to people in Weatherford, Mineral Wells, Aledo, Azle, Millsap, Brock, Cool, Peaster, Hudson Oaks, Willow Park, Springtown, and other places in Parker and Palo Pinto counties. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Parker Drilling Management Services. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:02 am
  NDAs spark Opternative v Warby Parker dispute:  Last week, Warby Parker - an eyewear retailer - was hit with a trade secrets lawsuit brought by Opternative (a Chicago-based healthcare technology start-up) in the Southern District of New York alleging that Warby Parker violated a non-disclosure agreement and misappropriated trade secrets. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 9:55 am
Plaintiffs' damages theory, which argues for statutory damages of from 2,142 to 428,571 times the actual damages, would lead to an unconstitutional result (Parker v. [read post]