Search for: "People v Piznarski"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2013, 5:50 am
Piznarski, supra (quoting People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Today, People v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
”IMAGING DEVICE means any mechanical, digital or electronic viewing device, camera or any other instrument capable of recording, storing or transmitting visual images that can be utilized to observe a person (Penal Law § 250.40[2]).SURREPTITIOUSLY means that the act was done stealthily or secretively (People v Piznarski,113 AD3d 166 [3rd Dept 2013], citing Dictionary.com [Dictionary.com Unabridged, Random House, Inc.]). [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:17 am
Steel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
Case citation: People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:03 pm
–Ellis v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:47 am
” The court brought up US v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:02 am
Piznarski, 2014 N.Y. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:57 am
Okay, everybody else, all eight other people or all seven or eight people? [read post]
