Search for: "People v Reed" Results 101 - 120 of 627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2009, 2:33 pm
The First Case After Jones - Reed The first wrongful birth case decided by the Court of Appeals after Jones was Reed v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:52 am by Eric Goldman
Altajir * Facebook Evidence Suppressed in Skater Brawl Prosecution–People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Unclear how far the Court had gone, and remains unclear; Court hasn’t taken a commercial speech case since then, though it has had Reed v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
            This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog only. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In a media release, the penal reform charity notes that in its experience of working in prisons, carrying out research and representing young people in custody, “segregating vulnerable and disturbed people tends to make their problems worse”. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
  Dissolution refers power back to the people by giving them a chance to elect new representations, whereas after prorogation the same MPs reconvene. 1210: Lord Garnier QC refers to witness statement of Sir John Major KG CH as to the purpose of prorogation, why it is exercised and what considerations might impact on its use. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The discovery rule pertinent to the statute of limitations was reviewed in the case of Vidra v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
" the IPKat reported briefly on a joint seminar which he shared with the British Literary and Artistic Copyright Association (BLACA) earlier this year in the lovely London offices of Reed Smith. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 3:45 am
As Lucy Reed at Pink Tape asks: This is news? [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 8:51 am
Covid has killed more than a million people. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 7:16 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Reed, said, "An intent to exclude coverage must be expressed in clear and unambiguous language." [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
We have also asked them to link to the original judgments here so people can form their own informed view as to whether Mr Booker is right or not. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
 Lord Reed, at [55]-[57], says 55. [read post]