Search for: "People v Rogers" Results 61 - 80 of 1,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2011, 9:16 pm by Walter Olson
Some of Newt Gingrich’s curious ideas about the role of the judiciary are nowhere to be found in the constitution, observes my Cato colleague Roger Pilon [Philadelphia Inquirer] Related, Damon Root: “The Left-Wing Origins of Newt Gingrich’s Attack on the Courts” [Reason] Tags: constitutional law, Newt Gingrich Related posts “Gingrich, the anti-conservative” (7) Wyeth v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Roger Pilon introduced and there were comments from University of Maryland law professor Robert Percival. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
 Roger Hartley examines familiar examples like the ERA, balanced budget amendment proposals, and pro-life attempts to overturn Roe v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 9:34 am
Barker's lawyers have sent the judge a copy.October 4, 2007, Letter of Morlan Ty Rogers (Submitting Copy of September 27, 2007, order in Atlantic v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am by Walter Olson
Roger Pilon has more at Cato here and here. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:05 am by Neal Fortin
My favorite part is the exchange between Judge Roger W. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:05 am
Sponsored Topics: Michael Vick - Roger Goodell - NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell - NFL - Football [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Joan Rataic-Lang
When we look at the Rogers Adoption / Innovation Curve we see that people who adopt to change quickly are a small portion of the population. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Nicklin in Craig Wright v Roger Ver ([2019] EWHC 2094 (QB)) confirms the high hurdle that a claimant must overcome in a defamation case where section 9 of the Defamation Act 2013 applies. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:54 am by David Fraser
I blogged a couple of days ago about the important case of R v Rogers, 2016 ONSC 70 (Canadian Privacy Law Blog: Ontario court provides clear guidance on privacy and "tower dumps" in R v Rogers and Telus). [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
The claimant sued after the council sent an email to a number of people, informing them that her name had been put onto its “violent persons register”. [read post]