Search for: "People v Sparber"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2008, 10:00 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:15 pm
In April, 2008 the Court of Appeals in People v Sparber (10 NY3d 457 [2008]), held that only a judge, and not prison or court clerks can impose Post Release Supervision [PRS], even when sentencing courts failed to pronounce PRS as required by law. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:17 pm
Today, in People of State of New York ex rel. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 12:54 am
People v Waggoner, 53 AD3d 1143). [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:46 am
The Court reached a similar issue last year in People v Sparber, 10 NY3d 457 [2008], in which the Court held that post-release supervision is a component element of a sentence of which a defendant must be advised at the time of sentencing.However, here in People v Guerrero, the Court held that the mandatory surcharge and crime victim assistance fee are not part of the defendant's sentence, and thus, a judge need not pronounce them in a… [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
Sparber and Garner v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 10:36 am
John Lingle; The People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:44 am
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, SENTENCING People v, Sparber , No. 53 "In appeals considering whether defendants were entitled to relief of their statutory obligation to serve a term of post-release supervision (PRS) because sentencing courts failed to pronounce their PRS terms in accordance with Crim. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:46 am
The Court reached a similar issue last year in People v Sparber, 10 NY3d 457 [2008], in which the Court held that post-release supervision is a component element of a sentence of which a defendant must be advised at the time of sentencing.However, here in People v Guerrero, the Court held that the mandatory surcharge and crime victim assistance fee are not part of the defendant's sentence, and thus, a judge need not pronounce them in a… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:46 am
The Court reached a similar issue last year in People v Sparber, 10 NY3d 457 [2008], in which the Court held that post-release supervision is a component element of a sentence of which a defendant must be advised at the time of sentencing.However, here in People v Guerrero, the Court held that the mandatory surcharge and crime victim assistance fee are not part of the defendant's sentence, and thus, a judge need not pronounce them in a… [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:27 pm
Sparber. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:56 pm
New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., and People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:47 pm
At issue before the Court of Appeals recently was the question whether a defendant could - by sacrificing an illegally lenient sentence on a prior conviction - remove a predicate conviction by effectively moving his conviction date from before the current crime was comhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifmitted to after.The answer under the facts in this case was no (People v Acevedo, 2011 NY Slip Op 05582 [decided June 30, 2011]). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:11 pm
Sparber, Shevin, Shapo, Rosen & Heilbronner, 612 So.2d 1378, 1380 (Fla.1993); Kinney v. [read post]
