Search for: "People v Stokes"
Results 1 - 20
of 217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2016, 4:31 am
In a bizarre comparison, Nico Pitney at Huff Post compares Donald Trump with Louis Stokes, who argued for the petitioner in Terry v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm
In fact, the only pain and anguish spared by the pre-trial settlement in Stokes v The Sun is to the defendants themselves – spared, that is, from their woeful defence being dissected in open court. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:47 pm
There is already a crisis in people’s faith in democratic institutions. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Stokes v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:24 am
Or people with bad breath? [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Ross; Moore v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:31 pm
Taken together, these sorry stories show the need for tougher regulation of media processes to ensure fairness for people directly affected by publications. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 7:05 am
People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:38 am
HLS has commemorated a number of historical milestones in recent months including the 40th anniversary of Terry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:47 am
Wickard v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:30 am
Very few people remember, however, the Court's first reproductive rights case, Skinner v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:59 am
I thought that Roe v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Carmichael, Stokely and Charles V. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:06 pm
Birmingham do not appear to be the only authority to obtain such orders in the last year or so, Stoke and Warwickshire have, apparently, also succeeded. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:27 am
posted by Michael Stokes PaulsenMy thanks to Jack Balkin for inviting me to guest-blog for a while. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:29 am
Earnest Stokes. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
