Search for: "People v Waterman" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2014, 6:01 am by Joy Waltemath
Justices Waterman and Mansfield dissented (Goodpaster v Schwan’s Home Service, Inc, June 27, 2014, Cady, M). [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
The person preparing the report is also likely to have access to those people most knowledgeable about the incident at a time the incident is fresh in mind. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Benjamin Bissell
Andy Wang noted that the Supreme Court asked for the views of the Solicitor General in Samantar v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 8:39 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Waterman, the court found in this case it should be deducted. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under the State Constitution, the Supreme Court is a court of “general original” (i.e., “unlimited”) jurisdiction, meaning it is “competent to entertain all causes of action unless its jurisdiction has been specifically proscribed” (People v Correa, 15 NY3d 213 [2010] [quotations omitted]). [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:30 am
For instance, in Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. [read post]