Search for: "People v Watkins"
Results 1 - 20
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
Watkins v Woolas [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB); [2010] WLR (D) 288 “S 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, which imposed the penalties for an election candidate found guilty of a corrupt or illegal practice, was compatible with the right to freedom of expression contained in art 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:17 am
Dec. 12, 2018) Watkins v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
On March 21, 2021, in Watkins v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
The Court granted leave in People v Pullen and People v Watkins, denied eleven applications, held two cases in abeyance pending the outcomes of People v Pullen and People v Watkins, and in lieu of granting leave to appeal, the Court reversed the Court of Appeals in two cases and remanded one case to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:15 am
As a result, Dallas has exonerated more people in the past three years than any other county in the US.Some go back to the era of legendary Dallas DA for 36 years, Henry Wade, who was one side of the pivotal supreme court case over abortion rights, Roe v Wade. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:27 am
The plaintiffs in the Bailey v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:17 am
And in People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:04 pm
The case cite is Watkins v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
” [Citations]; see also People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:27 am
Watkins, Case No. 142031 and People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
" People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm
Robert Elwyn Watkins v Philip James Woolas [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB) 5 November 2010- read judgment The Election Court has ruled that the Labour MP for Oldham knowingly and deliberately misled the constituency and as a result his election is void under Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act (1983). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:10 am
In a move that can best be described as cheap, Latham & Watkins joins a growing list of firms that will not allow associates to accrue vacation time. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:43 pm
Pullen, Case No. 142751 and People v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 4:34 pm
People v Watkins, 10 AD3d 665, 665-666, lv denied 3 NY3d 761). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 2:25 pm
Most importantly it places her case in a history of LGBTQ rights litigation, including Watkins v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
A thousand thanks to the IPKat's friends at the London office of Latham & Watkins LLP for hosting this year's IP Publishers and Editors Lunch on behalf of this weblog. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Appellate Court of Illinois – Fifth Division: People v. [read post]
