Search for: "People v Watkins" Results 1 - 20 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 2:14 am by sally
Watkins v Woolas [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB); [2010] WLR (D) 288 “S 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983, which imposed the penalties for an election candidate found guilty of a corrupt or illegal practice, was compatible with the right to freedom of expression contained in art 10 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:34 am by Layla Kuhl
The Court granted leave in People v Pullen and People v Watkins, denied eleven applications, held two cases in abeyance pending the outcomes of People v Pullen and People v Watkins, and in lieu of granting leave to appeal, the Court reversed the Court of Appeals in two cases and remanded one case to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 1:06 pm
  If defendant were a hothead inclined to shoot people, why didn't he shoot those earlier people he actually robbed and who -- almost to a person -- gave him "lip" or otherwise (to a perverse mind)"deserved" to be shot? [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:15 am by Steve Hall
As a result, Dallas has exonerated more people in the past three years than any other county in the US.Some go back to the era of legendary Dallas DA for 36 years, Henry Wade, who was one side of the pivotal supreme court case over abortion rights, Roe v Wade. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 5:33 pm by Julie Lam
In lieu of granting leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 2:50 am
The Michigan Supreme Court scheduled mini-oral argument to decide whether to grant leave to appeal in in People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Robert Elwyn Watkins v Philip James Woolas  [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB) 5 November 2010- read judgment The Election Court has ruled that the Labour MP for Oldham knowingly and deliberately misled the constituency and as a result his election is void under Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act (1983).   [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:10 am by Elie Mystal
In a move that can best be described as cheap, Latham & Watkins joins a growing list of firms that will not allow associates to accrue vacation time. [read post]