Search for: "People v Weaver" Results 41 - 60 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday’s final decision was in Weaver v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” On Wednesday, the court heard oral argument in Weaver v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:51 am by Liisa Speaker
" Weaver v Graham 450 U.S. 24, 31 (1981)A civil and regulatory law such as SORA doesn't violate the Ex Post Facto clause unless the challenger can clearly and convincingly show that the civil remedy is really a criminal penalty. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” New York State’s Court of Appeals ruled that a warrantless installation of a GPS device to track an individual suspected of criminal activity was barred by New York State’s Constitution, citing People v Weaver, 12 NY3d 433.*** The Weaver court noted that Article 1, §12, of New York State’s Constitution, in addition to tracking the language of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, provides: "The right of… [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Elisabeth Fontugne, Respecting Religion: How Court and Congress Impermissibly Treaded on Sacred Ground to the People's Detriment, (December 15, 2015).Jared A. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by David Markus
Today, SCOTUSblog correspondent Howe used it to take in the entire oral argument in King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was  unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_01735.htmThe… [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Weaver v Corcoran and ors (2015 BCSC 165) claimant scientist Dr Andrew Weaver was awarded damages of Can $50,000 in respect of a series of articles in the National Post which alleged that he was untrustworthy, unscientific and incompetent. [read post]