Search for: "People v Wright"
Results 1 - 20
of 681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
At least for some people. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:10 am
Regina (Wright and Others) v Secretary of State for Health and Another House of Lords “The procedure of effectively banning care workers from working with vulnerable people, without giving them an opportunity to answer any allegations of unsuitability, was incompatible with the right to a fair hearing under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 10:41 pm
In People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 8:50 pm
The above question was posed to Florida’s Fourth District of Appeal in Wright v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
Ct. 1937 (2009).Today's thought was prompted by the recent decision granting without prejudice a motion to dismiss in Wright v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 2:47 am
Capital L O V E, LOVED it. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
Wright. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
There are actually people (e.g., guards) who voluntarily elect to pay market rates to live on the grounds of San Quentin prison?! [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
Wright's challenge is limited to the search of the desktop computer, which was conducted without a warrant but with Hamilton's consent.The Fourth Amendment guarantees the `right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 5:52 am
In U.S. v Wright the defendant Wright pled guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and aggravated identity theft by filing fraudulent tax returns in the name of identity theft victims in order to obtain the refunds in violation of 18 USC §1349 and possessing 15 or more counterfeit and unauthorized access devised with the intent to defrauds in violation of 18 USC §1029. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm
the court has no discretion; concurrent sentences are mandated' " (People v Roundtree, 75 AD3d 1136, 1138, lv denied 15 NY3d 855, quoting People v Hamilton, 4 NY3d 654, 658; see People v Cromwell, 71 AD3d 414, 415, lv denied 15 NY3d 803; People v Mercer, 66 AD3d 1368, 1370, lv denied 13 NY3d 940). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:29 am
The House of Lords gave judgment yesterday in this human rights judicial review about provisional listing under Part VII of the Care Standards Act 2000, which sets up a scheme for "listing" people thought unsuitable to work with children and vulnerable adults - and preventing those listed from working in a care position.Before I go on, I'd better declare an interest: back in 1999 and 2000 I was [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
Pursuant to VTL §1194, a field test serves to determine probable cause for an arrest and it is the chemical breath test that may be admitted at trial as held in the landmark cases of People v Reed, People v Schook, People v Thomas and People v Wright. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:39 am
The style of the case is Trisha Braziel, Spencer Braziel and Kathy Wright v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:27 pm
But in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 8:43 pm
Jasty v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 2:53 am
Wright v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:30 am
Wright prevailed in this lawsuit against Musant, who appeals.The case is Wright v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am
The decision of Mr Justice Nicklin in Craig Wright v Roger Ver ([2019] EWHC 2094 (QB)) confirms the high hurdle that a claimant must overcome in a defamation case where section 9 of the Defamation Act 2013 applies. [read post]
