Search for: "People v. Able"
Results 81 - 100
of 13,719
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2021, 10:15 am
When it’s mishandled, we should be able to take those companies to court. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm
It was held in People v Moore, People v Doyle, People v Colon and People v LoVerde that the testimony of the victim must be corroborated if the offense charged is intrinsically related to or committed in aid of affecting the sex crime. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm
Except for one thing.Fallon Flores was charged with murder but pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter, and after the passage of Senate Bill 1437, thinks she might be able to be resentenced under its provisions. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:14 am
And, yes, do I think it's likely that the defendant did it, sure, but I gotta say that the evidence of guilt is pretty darn scant, and a fair piece less than you find in most of these cases.One of the things that the Supreme Court occasionally talks about in death penalty cases is how you're supposed to be able to rationally distinguish those who die from those who live. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Those are not trivial costs either.So the real questions are (1) what the Constitution requires (not what the statute says), (2) what's the best policy, for the individual and/or the state, and (3) which procedure is most efficient; a system that routinely enters mandatory orders that few people will ever pay and that burdens people and the system with their enforcement, or a system that takes into account ability to pay but requires hearings for those defendants… [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:23 pm
I'm entirely confident that most people who have pleaded guilty will in fact not be able to successfully petition for factual innocence. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 9:16 pm
Roe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:04 am
In the case of G2000 v. 2000, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court showed Chinese Trademark Law is still more interesting than the Leifeng Pagoda in Hangzhou, and the Hong Kong star sex scandal. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:42 pm
Sure, in an extraordinary small number of cases, we might be able to definitively call one side or the other "true" or "false" and rely on such a conclusion. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 9:14 am
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Brandt v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:13 am
v=_ymbv-Z5KRk The post AbleGamers: breaking down barriers for people with disabilities appeared first on Michigan Birth Injury & HIE Attorneys. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 9:01 am
And would courtroom marshalls be able to restrain the Incredible Hulk? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 1:49 pm
SEPTA v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:11 pm
Williams v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:32 pm
Blogger's note: Loving v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
But the fewer people who are bound by the ruling, the fewer people have standing to appeal. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:46 am
Any one IP address can provide Internet access to any number of people; many people share their Internet connections within their household or with their community, and they generally aren’t able to control what others do online. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 10:43 am
On April 10, in People of California v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:32 am
See, McAllister Hotel, Inc. v. [read post]
