Search for: "People v. Acuff" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2014, 10:34 am by Mitch Stoltz and Parker Higgins
Acuff-Rose Music ("Whether ... parody is in good taste or bad does not and should not matter to fair use") and Yankee Publishing Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:20 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994); Dr. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:10 pm by Terry Hart
Music publisher Acuff-Rose Music had denied 2 Live Crew a license to parody the song; 2 Live Crew recorded and released it anyway, and Acuff-Rose sued for copyright infringement. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
  It seems that the complete duplication may be “excessive”, in light of the quantity, quality and importance of the material used (Blanch v Koons).Bruno is unimpressed with the dumb Starbucks crownhe has to wear to make his significant human happyIn relation to market effects, would the hundreds of people queuing up for Dumb Starbucks have alternately visited the original coffee retailer that day? [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:52 am
The unpublished nature of the work undermines that in some measure (see, e.g., Harper & Row v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:00 am by Terry Hart
Acuff-Rose, 510 US 569 (1994. [read post]
4 Jul 2006, 12:19 pm
The case is called Campbell, aka Skyywalker, et al. v Acuff Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994). [read post]