Search for: "People v. Aiken" Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Several people have commented that switching from grain to grass feeding could be one of the solutions to the problem with foodborne pathogens in cattle and other livestock. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
. “Identifiable” material would be treated differently from “non-identifiable” content, with the aspiration “that, over time, people will pay less attention to and take less notice of material which is anonymous”. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Aiken, in which the Court states: The creative work is to be encouraged and rewarded, but private motivation must ultimately serve the cause of promoting broad public availability of literature, music, and other arts. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Judging by some of the comments on sites reporting on the ”Free Bieber” campaign, this idea is news to many people. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Aiken: The immediate effect of our copyright law is to secure a fair return for an “author’s” creative labor. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
Aiken: The immediate effect of our copyright law is to secure a fair return for an “author’s” creative labor. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
The rule was designed to address concerns that people who were otherwise prohibited from obtaining firearms could readily obtain parts that they could rapidly assemble into firearms. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:59 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Under Shared Parental Leave rules, people can take both types of leave, and usually do in practice — i.e., start adoption leave then switch into Shared Parental Leave. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
” Not only do people enter with full knowledge but there is no charge. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]