Search for: "People v. Allen (1986)" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The draft Public Order Act 1986 (Serious Disruption to Life in the Community Regulations 2023, if they come into effect, will allow police in England and Wales to impose restrictions on protests and processions that cause “more than minor” hindrance to day-to-day activities for other people. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Barrister Adam Wagner has published his legal opinion on the potential impact of the Public Order Act 1986 (Serious Disruption to the Life of the Community) Regulations 2023 on protest activities. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm by Aaron Moss
These are apparently go-to accessories for people who don’t have skin. 5. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It appears that Georgia attorneys representing injured people may have to give up on direct attacks on the state adoption of Daubert, and do the harder work in each case of beating defense Daubert motions and making offensive use of Daubert against defense expert. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:44 am
The Supreme Court ruled in 1986 that prosecutors may not exclude people from a jury solely because of their race. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by INFORRM
” Media defence lawyer David Allen Green offered his considered support for the draft bill in New Statesman. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]