Search for: "People v. Ames" Results 21 - 40 of 6,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2016, 1:59 pm
 Or if you break into one apartment, rented by two people, and the door to each occupant's bedroom is locked with a padlock, since it's not really "shared" space, I can see why some people would want that to be two (rather than one) burglaries. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:33 pm by Betsy McKenzie
  (sorry, California friends -- I am glad for you, too!) [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
 Articulating his belief that the trial court had been too generous to Rogers.So that's something, I guess.Not that I am feeling especially bad for Rogers. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:58 am
I am exhausted.Not over the stuff you might think. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
  What you are really pleading is "not guilty by reason of insanity," and the People are agreeing. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:31 am
Frierson (1991) 53 Cal.3d 730, 740, 742), as may one made four days before trial is to begin (People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 10:33 am by Tom Smith
Ford v Ferrari is a glorious throwback to the era when big stars did quality movies about actual people with real-life problems, but the scripts nevertheless adhered to basic Hollywood formulae such as “Have an exciting climax. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:48 pm
  I can't draw you a precise picture of the events in words -- nor can the police in their testimony -- but I am absolutely confident that I (along with the police) can reasonably distinguish between someone who looks like they're texting with an unseen object in their right hand and someone who's, say, adjusting their crotch.And we not only allow the police to pull over the former, but affirmatively want them to.Silly argument. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:29 pm
 But I am sufficiently marginally connected with reality that I know the face when I see it. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:38 pm
Many of the Illinois traffic laws are written in broad terms and the discretion for enforcing them is vested in the Illinois Secretary of State. 625 ILCS 5/2-101; People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:28 pm
 For example, I am confident that lots of people use guns illegally, and that some guns -- I'm thinking of things like MAC-10s, for example -- may be predominantly used by criminals. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 11:12 am by Kent Scheidegger
  I am confident that the Supreme Court will take the case and reverse if it comes to that, but hopefully we will get a reversal earlier. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:11 pm by Paul Horwitz
I am reminded of Richard Posner's statement in Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:15 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In Balkin's case, it's the Thirteenth amendment and "the (in)famous 1830 case of State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:48 am by Paul Horwitz
He argues that just as the Court accepted in Printz and New York v. [read post]