Search for: "People v. Arnold" Results 1 - 20 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Arnold (96 NY2d 358, 363) the Court of Appeals held that when a prospective juror makes a statement or statements that "cast serious doubt on [his or her] ability to render an impartial verdict" (People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 363), that prospective juror must be excused for cause unless he or she provides an "unequivocal assurance that [he or she] can set aside any bias and render an impartial verdict based on the evidence" While no… [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am by Rose Hughes
The case of Emson v Hozelock ([2020] EWCA Civ 871) considered whether a relatively technically simple invention was non-obvious in view of an obscure prior art document. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:11 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Court of Appeals has repeatedly held that a prospective juror with actual bias, such as an opinion that the defendant is guilty, is qualified to serve on a jury as long as gives an unequivocal assurance she can be fair and impartial (People v Nicholas, 98 NY2d 749, 751 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600, 614 [2000]). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
  These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:15 pm by Arnold & Wadsworth
It was nice to meet so many great people. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
In a judgment delivered on 22 February 2018 in the case of Ali v Channel 5 Broadcast ([2018] EWHC 298 (Ch)) Arnold J ordered Channel 5 to pay £20,000 in damages for misuse of private information to a couple, Shakir Ali and Shahida Aslam, who had fallen into rent arears. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
How the state addresses the needs of the seriously mentally ill was the subject of Arnold v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 8:00 am by admin
The criminal defense lawyers at Arnold & Wadsworth offer a free consultation to people facing Robbery Charges, or any other criminal charges in the State of Utah. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:14 pm by Peter Groves
In the US, as Dr Bonadio (who incidentally calls Arnold J "Justice Arnold", thus promoting him to the Supreme Court) notes, graffiti artists would probably be denied copyright protection under the "clean hands" doctrine.A graffiti-sprayer with dirty hands - there's an interesting idea ... [read post]