Search for: "People v. Arnold" Results 1 - 20 of 499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2021, 8:34 am by Austin M. Scherer
  [1] Bruce Love, Arnold & Porter Partner Faces More Litigation By Denmark Over Tax Controversy, LAW.COM, https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2021/06/17/arnold-porter-partner-faces-more-litigation-by-denmark-over-tax-controversy/, Jun. 17, 2021 (last visited Jul. 16, 2021). [2] Id. [3] Love, supra. [4] SKAT v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 8:34 am by Austin M. Scherer
  [1] Bruce Love, Arnold & Porter Partner Faces More Litigation By Denmark Over Tax Controversy, LAW.COM, https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2021/06/17/arnold-porter-partner-faces-more-litigation-by-denmark-over-tax-controversy/, Jun. 17, 2021 (last visited Jul. 16, 2021). [2] Id. [3] Love, supra. [4] SKAT v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Arnold (96 NY2d 358, 363) the Court of Appeals held that when a prospective juror makes a statement or statements that "cast serious doubt on [his or her] ability to render an impartial verdict" (People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 363), that prospective juror must be excused for cause unless he or she provides an "unequivocal assurance that [he or she] can set aside any bias and render an impartial verdict based on the… [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:19 am
Great Hall of the People ChongqingAuthor flyerletian Licence  CCO 1.0  Soutce Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Peter Jackson, Arnold and Phillips) Nokia Technologies OY and another v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co Ltd and others [2022] EWCA Civ 947 (11 July 2022)This was an appeal from the judgment of HH Judge Hacon sitting as a judge of the High Court in Nokia [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am by Rose Hughes
The case of Emson v Hozelock ([2020] EWCA Civ 871) considered whether a relatively technically simple invention was non-obvious in view of an obscure prior art document. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:11 am by Brian Shiffrin
The Court of Appeals has repeatedly held that a prospective juror with actual bias, such as an opinion that the defendant is guilty, is qualified to serve on a jury as long as gives an unequivocal assurance she can be fair and impartial (People v Nicholas, 98 NY2d 749, 751 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600, 614 [2000]). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
  These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:15 pm by Arnold & Wadsworth
It was nice to meet so many great people. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
In a judgment delivered on 22 February 2018 in the case of Ali v Channel 5 Broadcast ([2018] EWHC 298 (Ch)) Arnold J ordered Channel 5 to pay £20,000 in damages for misuse of private information to a couple, Shakir Ali and Shahida Aslam, who had fallen into rent arears. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
How the state addresses the needs of the seriously mentally ill was the subject of Arnold v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
DUI defense attorney Brian E Arnold offers a free consultation if you are facing any criminal charges including Felony DUI. [read post]