Search for: "People v. Arnold" Results 41 - 60 of 529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363… [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
 Thankfully, GuestKat Eibhlin Vardy will soon be reporting on the Court of Appeal's decision in Napp v Dr Reddy where the Court upheld Mr Justice Arnold's construction (see the first instance report by wonderful Kat friend Amy Crouch here). [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm by L. Gopika
 Justice Arnold, also relied on case law such as 20C Fox v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 9:16 am by Kent Scheidegger
  See my post on last February's Supreme Court decision in Buck v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:49 pm
The IPKat noted here the decision of Mr Justice Arnold last May in L'Oréal SA and others v eBay International AG and others [2009] EWHC 1094 (Ch). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
That was the opening sentence of Mr Justice Arnold's judgment in Interflora, Inc. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:10 am by Jani
".Applying the conditions to the case Justice Arnold quickly saw that all of the requirements had been fulfilled. [read post]