Search for: "People v. Bailey (1983)" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Joy Waltemath
If he does so, he may not hide behind the veil of qualified immunity,” the appeals court declared (Bailey v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It ruled that this goal must be pursued under the Court’s one-person, one-vote mandate and the Court’s 1983 ruling in Karcher v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Bailey, No. 06-5576 Defendant's conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) a prior Kentucky state court conviction for second-degree escape did not qualify for a career offender enhancement; 2) there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions; and 3) the district court erred in enhancing his Guidelines offense level after finding that he had perjured himself at trial. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
  It invites juries to decide cases on improper bases – that all these people wouldn’t be suing unless something was wrong. [read post]