Search for: "People v. Baker (1970)" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2011, 1:30 am by Stephanie Woods, Olswang
In the alternative, if foresight was relevant it was held that by the early 1970s any employer keeping abreast of developing knowledge would have known that exposure to 85dB(A)lepd was harmful to some people, making the workplace unsafe and consequently an employer should do what was reasonably practicable to make and keep it safe. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
So written terms that people intended as a complete and final expression of their bargain on the subject cannot be supplemented or contradicted by evidence of prior agreements or any oral contemporaneous agreements. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm by Joseph Fishkin
  Justice Harlan was dissenting from the Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
But the argument bombed in a moot session and ultimately attracted only the vote of Justice Denise Johnson in Baker v. [read post]