Search for: "People v. Barclay" Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by John Mikhail
Trump cannot withstand scrutiny.In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Google is to remove private medical records from search results after people request action. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
Barclays Bank PLC, et al., 16-239. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:28 pm by Kevin
Yet this, too, is something people repeatedly do. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am by INFORRM
The Sunday People is facing a £100,000 payout after using information from an apparently stolen mobile phone. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:43 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Friel of BakerHostetler on the firm’s blog, Data Privacy Monitor Sierra Club threatens to sue oil companies over frackquakes – Barclay Nicholson and Andrew Elkhoury of Norton Rose Fulbright on the firm’s Hydraulic Fracking Blog Bench trials and unconscious bias, are judges people too? [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
In this Kat's opinion, furthermore copyright does not only vest in those extracts that include the copyright-protected works mentioned by the CJEU, including the Premier League and Barclays logos, as Arnold J clarified in FAPL v BSkyB and Others (see paras 8 ff; this action originated as an application for a blocking injunction as per section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)).There is also copyright in those broadcast extracts which… [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK By ERIC T. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am by Heather Green, University of Aberdeen
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in  R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
It alleges that during the class period the defendants misled these investors by making false or misleading statement or failing to disclose that   (i) Barclays engaged in a “systematic pattern of fraud and deceit” by using its dark pool to favor high-frequency traders over its other clients; (ii) the pools were promoted as offering investors protection from predatory traders, while Barclays instead courted HFT firms by charging them lower rates; (iii)… [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
(as he then was) cautioned in IBCOS Computers Limited v Barclays Mercantile Highland Finance Limited [1994] FSR 275 that while merely taking a sufficiently general idea does not infringe, to take a detailed “idea” may do so. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
 People carrying out transactions in U.K. markets need to have confidence that they are operating on a level-playing field with everyone else. [read post]