Search for: "People v. Barclay" Results 41 - 60 of 109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
In this Kat's opinion, furthermore copyright does not only vest in those extracts that include the copyright-protected works mentioned by the CJEU, including the Premier League and Barclays logos, as Arnold J clarified in FAPL v BSkyB and Others (see paras 8 ff; this action originated as an application for a blocking injunction as per section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)).There is also copyright in those broadcast extracts which… [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK By ERIC T. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am by Heather Green, University of Aberdeen
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in  R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
It alleges that during the class period the defendants misled these investors by making false or misleading statement or failing to disclose that   (i) Barclays engaged in a “systematic pattern of fraud and deceit” by using its dark pool to favor high-frequency traders over its other clients; (ii) the pools were promoted as offering investors protection from predatory traders, while Barclays instead courted HFT firms by charging them lower rates; (iii)… [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:19 pm by J
& C.R. 221 ; Barclays Bank Plc. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:56 am by Steven Buchwald
The case is New Jersey Basketball LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:56 am by Steven Buchwald
The case is New Jersey Basketball LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:56 am by Steven Buchwald
The case is New Jersey Basketball LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Nevada 2013http://t.co/rswYrYAV3V -> NY court dismisses copyright personal jurisdiction in TROMA ENTERT. v CENTENNIAL PICTURES 2nd Circuit 2013http://t.co/lcoVRKaYXz -> Link to Copyright case Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:10 am by Tessa Shepperson
I have been alerted by the PainSmith blog to a worrying case about property owners not being able to set aside a mortgage taken out by fraudsters: Barclays Bank Plc v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
(as he then was) cautioned in IBCOS Computers Limited v Barclays Mercantile Highland Finance Limited [1994] FSR 275 that while merely taking a sufficiently general idea does not infringe, to take a detailed “idea” may do so. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
 People carrying out transactions in U.K. markets need to have confidence that they are operating on a level-playing field with everyone else. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
(as he then was) cautioned in IBCOS Computers Limited v Barclays Mercantile Highland Finance Limited [1994] FSR 275 that while merely taking a sufficiently general idea does not infringe, to take a detailed “idea” may do so. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 3:27 am by Stephen Page
To paraphrase Lord Atkin in United Australia v Barclays Bank[7], today, when the ghost of Mallet stands in the path of a just and equitable outcome, clanking its gender biased chains, the proper course for a judge is to pass through it undeterred. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
BBC Panorama is expected to air its delayed programme about the owners of the Daily Telegraph, Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, reports the Guardian. [read post]