Search for: "People v. Barnett" Results 21 - 40 of 548
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am by Randy Barnett
It started to get that name only in the 20th century, as far as I can determine, when that term was applied to it by some people who were opposed to an Article V convention, because they opposed the proposed amendments. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:01 pm by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Marcus Cole reflects movingly on McDonald v City of Chicago in A Word of Thanks to Four Black Men and A Gun. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:56 am by Paul Horwitz
 One needn't expect more, I suppose, but it's not exactly high-order journalism -- more a skillful use of the ctrl-V function. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:27 am by Orin Kerr
“Its result can be reversed by the people in November, and its weak-tax-power holding reversed by any future Court without pause. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) The Times has a nice front-page profile of Randy Barnett, discussing his role in crafting the challenge to the ACA. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 4:15 pm
  The Gucci people don't like that. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
" And, this, of course, is how they suggest Brown v Board of Education can be justified on an originalist basis even if the expected application of the 14th Amendment as a whole by the people at the time was that it allowed segregated schools. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Andrew Hamm
History Through the Eyes of Everyday People. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:43 am
  Here's some reading to enjoy on this last day of vacation: Randy Barnett's op-ed on Raich in The Wall Street JournalDahlia Lithwick and Jack Goldsmith's take on the US Att'y firings in Slate An obit of Bowie Kuhn, of the famous Flood v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:02 am by Stewart Baker
Randy Barnett argues that NSA’s metadata program is bad because the government will use the information to target people for their political views and to embrace mission creep. [read post]