Search for: "People v. Barnett (1995)"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 11:23 am
Lopez, the 1995 decision striking down the Guns-Free School Zone Act. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:05 pm
And, as we all know, the Supreme Court expressly rejected this proposition in Lopez v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:23 am
But that doctrine was clarified in 1995. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:04 pm
So law professors were shocked when the Supreme Court in 1995 held in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 10:28 am
Barry Barnett Happy Friday the 13th! [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:46 pm
Harrington v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 1:19 pm
No Americans knew about the Gun Free School Zone Act that the Rehnquist Court had invalidated in 1995. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 7:55 am
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995) and Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:07 am
Barnette, 2007 U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), and Hurley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
Timothy McVeigh, who killed 168 people in the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, was sentenced to death under federal law in June of 1997. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Lopez (1995), Seminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Lopez (1995), Seminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
Barnett, Was the Right to Keep and Bear Arms Conditioned on Service in an Organized Militia? [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
Barnett & E. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am
Lopez (1995) (concurring). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
App. 1995), and Kwan v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:03 am
Barnette and Tinker v. [read post]