Search for: "People v. Barton" Results 1 - 20 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2013, 1:42 am by INFORRM
The way he stuck at the topic, he might almost have had people thinking it was credible gossip: “Are you Pre-Op or Post-Op? [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Barton Beebe, Is the Trademark Office a Rubber Stamp? [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 11:56 am
In People v Barton, 2006 NY Slip Op 09499, the New York Court of Appeals considered the issue of whether the provision of the City of Rochester's Municipal Code that prohibited aggressive panhandling... [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:06 pm
  If 11 people keep asking me hour after hour to explain my view, and I feel like I've done so more than competently, I may well react negatively to them saying things like (as here) "Just tell me yes or no . . . . [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 8:20 am
Barton Beebe gave a brief presentation on his empirical study of TM confusion cases and how the multifactor test for confusion plays out there, in contrast to Long's paper on dilution. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:12 pm by Andrew Hursh
The US Supreme Court released its decision on Thursday in the case of Barton v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 1:00 pm
 By contrast, it's the type of equitable, common sense, and undeniably fair opinion that people like me love.Competing styles, to be sure.But I think it's awesome. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:52 am by J
Pandongate House Management Co Ltd v Barton, High Ct (Newcastle District Registry), January 2019 (with thanks to Alice Richardson for a copy of the judgment) Lessee-owned companies are now pretty common. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Barton, 2017 ABCA 216 [1] The jury system is probably the most familiar symbol and manifestation of the Rule of Law in this country. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Barton, 2017 ABCA 216 [1] The jury system is probably the most familiar symbol and manifestation of the Rule of Law in this country. [read post]
14 Dec 2012, 1:53 am
 First, Barton introduced the background to this paper, which was pre-circulated to those attending ("colloquiants"?) [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:52 am by Renee Newman Knake
The Supreme Court considered this question yesterday during oral argument for Turner v. [read post]