Search for: "People v. Barton (1995)"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2013, 1:42 am
Indeed, ‘looks like’ was part of the tweet and the court would be obliged to consider the whole, despite how the majority of headlines have singled out the phrase (Charleston v News Group (1995)). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:16 am
The case is Barton v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:20 am
Civil proceedings have, since 1995, advocated this exclusively objective test (Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan [1995] 2 AC 164, confirmed by Barlow Clowes International Ltd v Eurotrust International Ltd [2005] UKPC 37). [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:03 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:12 am
People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 1:37 pm
Police Officers Ass'n (5th Cir. 1995) (Title VII); see also Dambrot v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
The brief is on behalf of 27 intellectual property law and constitutional law professors: Jack Balkin (Yale Law School) Barton Beebe (NYU School of Law) Stacey L. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
But people wish they could afford the protections of a lawyer’s solicitor-client relationship instead of having to depend upon merely LegalZoom’s buyer-seller relationship. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
