Search for: "People v. Bauman"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2009, 10:42 am
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:26 am
March 26, 2009 CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
In People v Bauman (2009 NY Slip Op 02265, 3/26/09) the Court of Appeals held that an indictment charging depraved indifference assault under Penal Law § 120.10 (3) which alleged eleven acts over an eight month period under one count violated Criminal Procedure Law (CPL) § 200.30 (1) because it was duplicitous.The indictment charged two defendants with one count of intentional assault [*2]under Penal Law § 120.10 (1) (the first… [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:52 pm
Jose (Election Law)Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:24 pm
I told him about cases such as Bauman v Fussell and Temple Island v New English Teas (the celebrated "Red Bus" case) and it occurred to me that I was describing things that seemed quite normal to me because I have lived with them for my entire professional life while they seemed astonishing and arbitrary to Robert because they didn't accord with what he felt was common sense and what he knew to be the way people do things in real life.Robert was… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:23 am
Three years ago, in Daimler AG v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
He predicts that, “[e]ither way . . . , the Supreme Court’s ruling . . . could drive more people to cut the cord. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Taken together, and as I describe below, the decisions — Bauman v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:59 am
Bauman, 2009 La. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:39 am
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 2:10 pm
A witness might fear that one of the people involved in a lawsuit might sue them. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:12 pm
Reasons for judgment were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, (Richard v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
Bauman, 134 S.Ct. 746 (2014). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
To establish liability, a plaintiff must point to “some act (or some failure to act) on the part of the occupier which caused the [plaintiff’s] injury”: Bauman v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:30 pm
Bond, the forum will discuss two issues: Why is Legal Aid important to you and the people you work with? [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 7:56 pm
The Supreme Court's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
In Bauman v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:21 am
The case of Bauman v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am
G, 2020 SCC 38 (38585) appeal from 2019 ONCA 264 “Christopher’s Law” draws discriminatory distinctions between people found guilty and people found NCRMD of sexual offences on the [read post]
