Search for: "People v. Baxter"
Results 1 - 20
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2009, 9:43 am
Arguments in Baxter v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm
Here is the abstract: In Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 4:16 pm
In People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 6:01 pm
In Ramsey v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 10:03 am
How would you describe your job to other people? [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Nor do Justices Werdegar and Moreno, who dissent.But Justice Baxter makes a nonfrivolous argument to the contrary, and persuades the remainder of the California Supreme Court.It's a tough call. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:53 am
Justice Baxter's right that the "give and take" of deliberations "will often" correct these errors. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:29 am
Justice Baxters says this appeal "may not be the last," but I can add to that: It definitely won't be the last.It's a death penalty case. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:14 am
Alas, a lot of damage has already been done thanks to plaintiffs' lawyers putting profits ahead of people. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:08 am
National Bank Assn.) and for the worst majority opinion (People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:04 am
Justice Baxter agrees, but writes separately to slo say that he'd vote to affirm even if only X existed. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:41 am
More on The Boise Case: A piece by Anchorage attorney Lee Baxter in the Alaska Landmine, discusses at length the petition by Boise, Idaho to have SCOTUS review the Ninth Circuit's 2018 Martin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 9:45 am
Prof Uelmen thought the best opinion of the year was Justice Liu's concurrence in People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:15 pm
Justice Baxter, who didn't participate in Wells, is in the majority, but that's not too surprising as well.Different perspectives on anonymous calls, but the result is that, at least in California, they authorize a seizure. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Ronald V. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Ronald V. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:34 pm
In the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
In MAIF v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
[People v. [read post]
